OK, the article on Slashdot may be a little extreme, and I haven’t RTFA (it’s really convoluted), but here’s a quote from /.
The Broadcast Treaty is a proposal from a WIPO Subcommittee that’s supposedly about stopping ’signal theft.’ But along the way, this proposal has turned into a huge, convoluted hairball that threatens to make the PC illegal, trash the public domain, break copyleft and put a Broadcast Flag on the Internet. The treaty negotiation process is unbelievably convoluted and hard-to-follow, and they’ve just wrapped up the latest round in Geneva.
The EFF has a (editized) transcript here: http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/001599.php#001599
Get it while it’s legal!
If all that’s true, that’s scarrrrry. Guess it’s time to become an outlaw :P.
—-
EDIT :: Just RTFA. Here’s the part about "banning computers"
from Article 16, Alternative V:
2. In particular, effective legal remedies shall be provided against those who:
…
(iii) participate in the manufacture, importation, sale, or any other act that makes available a device or system capable of decrypting or helping to decrypt an encrypted program-carrying signal.
Yes, every computer is capable of decrypting a broadcast signal. Just sloppy writing. Scarry thing is, this isn’t writing…it’s legislation–sloppy legislation.
About breaking public domain:
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has just released a draft of a treaty that would give broadcasters new power over material that they broadcast, even if that material in the public domain.
http://www.public-domain.org/?q=node/view/31
In this case, "broadcasters" would be anybody who would provide it to a large number of people. ISPs, magazines, etc.
Read this page!! http://www.public-domain.org/node/view/30